ComparisonComparisons19 min read

Silicone vs PharMed BPT vs Norprene: Choosing Peristaltic Pump Tubing by Material

Silicone, PharMed BPT and Norprene A-60-G solve different peristaltic-pump problems. Compare transparency, flex life, gas permeability, chemical exposure, sterilization and process documentation before changing tubing material.

Updated September 21, 2026How Equipvia researches
Laboratory peristaltic pump unit
Silicone, PharMed BPT and Norprene A-60-G solve different peristaltic-pump problems; material must stay mechanically stable and chemically compatible in the pump head and process. Photograph of a laboratory peristaltic pump via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0). View current tubing listing.

Disclosure: We may earn a commission if you purchase through links on this page, at no additional cost to you.

Silicone, PharMed BPT and Norprene A-60-G are all sold for peristaltic-pump service, but they should not be treated as three grades of the same tube.

They solve different process problems.

Silicone is attractive when flexibility, transparency and broad laboratory availability matter. PharMed BPT is a bioprocess-oriented thermoplastic elastomer formulated for repeated peristaltic flexing and documented biological applications. Norprene A-60-G is an industrial thermoplastic elastomer used where abrasion resistance, flex fatigue, chemical exposure and lower gas permeability are important.

The correct question is therefore not:

Which material is best?

It is:

Which material remains mechanically stable, chemically compatible and adequately documented in this pump head and process?

Decision Summary

Choose silicone when visual inspection, flexible handling and general laboratory service are priorities. Consider PharMed BPT when long pump life, bioprocess use and validation documentation matter. Consider Norprene A-60-G for industrial chemical transfer, pressure/vacuum duty and long flex life where an opaque black tube is acceptable. In every case, verify the exact size, formulation and pump-head compatibility rather than substituting by material name alone.

Start With the Process, Not the Polymer Name

Material selection should begin with six questions:

What fluid is being pumped?
At what concentration?
At what temperature?
Is the pump continuous or intermittent?
Does the operator need to see the fluid?
What documentation must the tubing carry?

Then add the mechanical requirements:

Pump-head model
ID / OD / wall thickness
RPM
Suction condition
Discharge pressure
Expected replacement interval

A chemically compatible tube can still fail mechanically. A long-life pump tube can still be unsuitable for a pharmaceutical process if the required documentation is missing.

ASTM D471 is useful here because it treats rubber-fluid compatibility as a change in material properties after liquid exposure rather than a simple yes/no label. The standard also cautions that accelerated liquid testing does not directly reproduce every service condition.

For peristaltic service, static compatibility is only the first screen. Final validation must include repeated compression in the actual pump.

Silicone: The Flexible, Visible General-Purpose Route

Silicone remains common in laboratory and food/bioprocess pumping because it is soft, flexible and available in many precision sizes.

Its most practical advantage is visibility.

Clear or translucent tubing lets an operator see:

  • bubbles;
  • incomplete priming;
  • particles;
  • color changes;
  • fluid interfaces;
  • contamination or residue.

That is valuable in bench work, dosing, media transfer and setups where operators visually confirm flow.

Silicone also tolerates sterilization and elevated temperatures in many formulations, but buyers should avoid carrying a temperature or sterilization claim from one silicone grade to another. Platinum-cured, peroxide-cured and generic silicone products can have different validation packages and mechanical behavior.

Where silicone is weaker

Peristaltic wear can become the limiting factor.

The roller repeatedly deforms the same section, so silicone can experience flow drift, flattening, fatigue and particle generation depending on formulation and operating conditions.

Masterflex technical guidance also describes silicone as relatively gas permeable compared with thermoplastic tubing. That can matter when the liquid is oxygen-sensitive or when gas transfer through the tube wall is undesirable.

A published pharmaceutical study comparing several pump-tubing materials found measurable spallation and flow changes for the silicone tubing used in that experiment. That result should not be generalized to every modern silicone formulation, but it demonstrates why sensitive processes should validate particle shedding and delivered volume rather than assume that a clean-looking tube is mechanically stable.

PharMed BPT: Long Flex Life for Bioprocess-Oriented Service

PharMed BPT is not simply “better silicone.” It is a specific thermoplastic-elastomer tubing family associated with Saint-Gobain.

Saint-Gobain states that PharMed BPT was formulated specifically for peristaltic pumping and can outlast silicone by up to 30 times under its stated test conditions. The manufacturer also provides biocompatibility and validation documentation and markets the product for media processing, cell harvest, chromatography, fermentation and diagnostics.

Those are manufacturer-specific performance claims, not universal ratios.

The practical reason to consider PharMed BPT is that the buying decision combines:

pump life + fluid integrity + process documentation

rather than transparency alone.

When PharMed BPT becomes attractive

It is particularly relevant when:

  • tubing replacement interrupts a process;
  • the pump runs for long periods;
  • repeatability matters over the tube's service life;
  • the application is biopharmaceutical or diagnostic;
  • validation documents are required;
  • repeated sterilization is part of the workflow.

The trade-off is visibility. PharMed BPT is typically opaque beige rather than clear, so it is less useful when continuous visual inspection of bubbles or particulates is important.

The buyer also needs to verify that a marketplace offer is actually the stated grade. “BPT,” “PharMed type” and “PharMed BPT” should not be treated as interchangeable descriptions without supporting documentation.

Norprene A-60-G: Industrial Flex Life and Chemical-Service Focus

Norprene A-60-G is another thermoplastic-elastomer tubing family, commonly supplied as an opaque black industrial tube.

Current Masterflex data describes A-60-G as suitable for applications requiring chemical, heat, ozone and UV resistance and specifically positions it for vacuum/pressure service. Sigma-Aldrich describes it as resistant to flex fatigue and suitable for acids, alkalies and oxidizing agents within the formulation's compatibility limits.

Its practical advantages are:

  • strong flex-fatigue resistance;
  • abrasion resistance;
  • industrial chemical-service positioning;
  • lower gas permeability than silicone-type tubing;
  • wide temperature capability for the stated formulation;
  • good suitability for repeated pump compression.

It is therefore a useful candidate for dosing chemicals, detergents, industrial fluids and processes where the tube is expected to run for long periods.

Where Norprene A-60-G is less convenient

It is black and opaque.

That removes direct visual confirmation of:

  • bubbles;
  • fluid color;
  • residue;
  • particulate contamination;
  • prime status inside the tube.

It also should not be substituted into a bioprocess simply because it has longer flex life. Documentation requirements and fluid-contact suitability are separate from mechanical durability.

Side-by-Side Decision Table

Selection factor Silicone PharMed BPT Norprene A-60-G
Visual inspection Strong Limited Limited
Typical appearance Clear / translucent Beige / opaque Black / opaque
Flex-life emphasis Moderate, formulation-dependent High High
Bioprocess documentation focus Depends strongly on grade Strong manufacturer focus Application-dependent
Gas permeability Relatively high Lower than silicone in many use cases Lower than silicone-type tubing
Industrial chemical-service focus Application-dependent Moderate Strong
Repeated sterilization Grade-dependent Manufacturer-supported Grade/application-dependent
Pump-head fit Must verify Must verify Must verify
Best buying use case General lab / visible transfer Bioprocess / long pump life Industrial dosing / long-life service

This table is a selection framework, not a compatibility chart. Exact chemical resistance, temperature and pressure limits must be checked for the precise formulation and tube size.

Chemical Compatibility Can Overrule Every Other Advantage

A long-life material is not useful if the process fluid attacks it.

Masterflex recommends checking every component of a solution, including minor acids or solvents, because small concentrations can change compatibility over long contact periods. It also notes that chemical resistance can decrease as temperature increases.

For a serious material change, record:

Main fluid
Minor components
Concentration
Temperature
Contact duration
Cleaning fluid
Sterilization method

Look for swelling, hardening, softening, mass change, dimensional change and loss of elastic recovery.

For difficult fluids, combine published compatibility data with a controlled immersion screen and a dynamic pump test.

Gas Permeability Matters More Than Many Buyers Expect

Gas transport through the tubing wall can affect sensitive liquids.

Silicone is commonly chosen for its flexibility and visibility, but its relatively high gas permeability can be a disadvantage when oxygen ingress, CO2 loss or anaerobic conditions matter.

PharMed-type and Norprene-type thermoplastic elastomers can provide lower gas permeability, although the exact values are formulation- and wall-dependent.

This does not automatically make the lower-permeability tube superior. If an operator needs to monitor bubbles or detect a failed prime visually, transparent silicone may still provide the better process control.

The decision is a trade-off between fluid isolation and operator visibility.

Pressure and Suction Performance Are Material-and-Size Specific

Softer tubing generally deforms more easily, while firmer tubing can better resist collapse or pressure in some pump configurations.

Masterflex's current guidance notes that pressure capability historically varies with material, with softer silicone formulations often lower than firmer long-life materials such as Norprene.

Do not convert that observation into a generic pressure rating.

Actual working pressure depends on:

  • tube size;
  • wall thickness;
  • pump-head design;
  • material;
  • temperature;
  • fitting arrangement.

If pressure is a major reason for switching material, obtain the rating for the exact tube and pump head.

Current Alibaba Buying Routes

The article intent requires different material roles rather than three nearly identical silicone products.

Silicone — low-friction replacement role

Kamoer currently offers peristaltic-pump silicone tubing in a low-MOQ buying format. The existing Equipvia CPS path for this Product ID has already been confirmed.

Use this route when the buyer wants a short replacement length or a sample before standardizing a larger order.

PharMed BPT — documentation / long-life candidate

Lei Rong currently lists a PharMed BPT peristaltic tube with a 1 meter MOQ, multiple dimensional variants, Start Order, and platform payment protection. The listing currently shows a 5-year Alibaba supplier profile, 4.9/5 rating, and stated on-time delivery above 90%.

The CPS path has been confirmed for this Product ID. Buyers should still confirm that the supplied material is the exact claimed PharMed BPT grade and that the requested supporting documentation is available.

Norprene A-60-G — industrial long-life alternative

JIHPUMP's current marketplace offer is positioned as Norprene/Tygon A-60-G peristaltic-pump tubing. Alibaba category data currently shows a 1 meter MOQ. Equipvia's CPS/Product-ID path for this listing has already been confirmed.

Use this as an industrial material candidate, not as evidence that A-60-G is compatible with every chemical or pump head.

Buyer Check: For trademarked materials such as PharMed BPT or Norprene/Tygon A-60-G, request the exact manufacturer/grade identification and supporting documentation. A marketplace title alone is not sufficient proof of material identity.

How to Make the Final Material Decision

Use a controlled comparison rather than changing material because one listing promises longer life.

Choose silicone first when:

  • visual inspection is operationally valuable;
  • the process is general laboratory transfer;
  • the current silicone grade is chemically compatible;
  • tubing cost and easy availability matter;
  • replacement intervals are already acceptable.

Evaluate PharMed BPT when:

  • pump downtime is costly;
  • long flex life is important;
  • the process is bioprocess or diagnostic;
  • validation documentation matters;
  • opaque tubing is acceptable.

Evaluate Norprene A-60-G when:

  • the duty is industrial;
  • flex fatigue and abrasion matter;
  • pressure/vacuum service is important;
  • acids, alkalies or other compatible industrial fluids are handled;
  • transparency is not required.

After selecting the material family, return to the dimensional rules from the tubing size guide. Material choice never overrides ID, OD, wall thickness and pump-head compatibility.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does PharMed BPT always last longer than silicone?

Saint-Gobain reports substantially longer pump life under its stated test conditions, but actual life depends on pump head, RPM, dimensions, pressure, temperature and fluid.

Is Norprene more chemically resistant than silicone?

Not universally. Compatibility is chemical-, concentration- and temperature-specific. Check the exact formulation against the actual process fluid.

Which tubing is best for seeing bubbles?

Clear or translucent silicone generally provides the easiest visual inspection.

Can I switch from silicone to PharMed BPT without changing pump settings?

Not automatically. Confirm compatible dimensions and wall construction, then recalibrate flow after the material change.

Which material is better for bioprocess use?

PharMed BPT has a strong bioprocess documentation and application focus, while specific platinum-cured silicone grades may also be appropriate. The required validation package should drive the decision.

Final Takeaway

Silicone, PharMed BPT and Norprene A-60-G are not interchangeable upgrades.

Silicone is strongest when transparency, flexible handling and general laboratory use matter.

PharMed BPT becomes compelling when long peristaltic flex life, bioprocess use and documentation are central to the buying decision.

Norprene A-60-G is a strong industrial candidate where flex fatigue, abrasion resistance, pressure/vacuum service and compatible chemical duty matter more than visibility.

The procurement sequence should be:

process fluid → chemical/temperature screen → visibility and gas-permeability needs → duty cycle → pressure/suction → documentation → exact material grade → pump-head dimensions → sample validation

That sequence turns “which tubing material is best?” into a repeatable engineering and purchasing decision.

Share this article

View all guides
Cooling & Condensation·20 min read

How to Size a Chiller for a Rotary Evaporator

Size a rotary evaporator chiller by required condenser temperature and cooling capacity at that temperature—not by minimum temperature or flask size alone.

Updated September 19, 2026